Sexuality in Elementary School...
A Wisconsin school district has developed a booklet for parents of elementary students to let them know how teachers will handle “sensitive” issues, such as masturbation and abortion. The booklet covers things such as contraception, sexual identity, and sexual intercourse. A 2012 law has changed the booklet to now include topics of abstinence, marriage, pregnancy and child-birth and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. (From the video that you can watch below, at the 0:56 mark).
The QUESTION is: Do you want your children to be taught about masturbation, contraception, sexual identity, sexual intercourse, STD diseases, etc.?
Of course NOT.
This is why the Catholic Church has traditionally condemned sex education classes. This is why today, when it has become common for even many Catholic schools to include sex-education classes in their curriculums, it seems very timely to remind parents that this teaching has been forbidden by the Church. When the child reaches the age of puberty, a father or a mother should instruct him or her with due prudence. But public sex-education classes are clearly condemned as a grave danger. You can read below.
Another very grave danger is that naturalism which today is invading the field of education in that most delicate matter of purity of customs. Far too common is the error of those who, with dangerous assurance and under an ugly term, propagate a so-called sex-education, falsely imagining they can forearm youths against the dangers of sensuality by purely natural means, such as a foolhardy initiation and precautionary instruction for all indiscriminately, even in public; and, worse still, by exposing them at an early age to the occasions, in order to accustom them, so it is argued, and as it were to harden them against such dangers.
Such persons grievously err in refusing to recognize the inborn weakness of human nature, and the law of which the Apostle speaks, fighting against the law of the mind (Rom 7: 23); and also in ignoring the experience of facts, from which it is clear that, particularly in young people, evil practices are the effect not so much of ignorance of intellect as of weakness of a will exposed to dangerous occasions, and unsupported by the means of grace.
In this extremely delicate matter, if, all things considered, some private instruction is found necessary and opportune from those who hold from God the commission to teach and who have the grace of state, every precaution must be taken. Such precautions are well known in traditional Christian education, and are adequately described by Antoniano cited above, when he says:
“Such is our misery and inclination to sin, that often in the very things considered to be remedies against sin, we find occasions for and inducements to sin itself. Hence it is of the highest importance that a good father, while discussing with his son a matter so delicate, should be well on his guard and not descend to details, nor refer to the various ways in which this infernal hydra destroys with its poison so large a portion of the world.
"Otherwise it may happen that instead of extinguishing this fire, he unwittingly stirs or kindles it in the simple and tender heart of the child. Speaking generally, during the period of childhood it suffices to employ those remedies which produce the double effect of opening the door to the virtue of purity and closing the door upon vice (Silvio Antonio, Dell 'educazione cristiana dei figliuoli, lib. II, e. 88).”
(Pius XI, Encyclical Divini Illius Magistri,
Petropolis: Vozes, 1950, nn. 65-67)
Petropolis: Vozes, 1950, nn. 65-67)